Lessons learned from quantitative dynamical modeling in systems biology


Due to the high complexity of biological data it is difficult to disentangle cellular processes relying only on intuitive interpretation of measurements. A Systems Biology approach that combines quantitative experimental data with dynamic mathematical modeling promises to yield deeper insights into these processes. Nevertheless, with growing complexity and increasing amount of quantitative experimental data, building realistic and reliable mathematical models can become a challenging task: the quality of experimental data has to be assessed objectively, unknown model parameters need to be estimated from the experimental data, and numerical calculations need to be precise and efficient. Here, we discuss, compare and characterize the performance of computational methods throughout the process of quantitative dynamic modeling using two previously established examples, for which quantitative, dose- and time-resolved experimental data are available. In particular, we present an approach that allows to determine the quality of experimental data in an efficient, objective and automated manner. Using this approach data generated by different measurement techniques and even in single replicates can be reliably used for mathematical modeling. For the estimation of unknown model parameters, the performance of different optimization algorithms was compared systematically. Our results show that deterministic derivative-based optimization employing the sensitivity equations in combination with a multi-start strategy based on latin hypercube sampling outperforms the other methods by orders of magnitude in accuracy and speed. Finally, we investigated transformations that yield a more efficient parameterization of the model and therefore lead to a further enhancement in optimization performance. We provide a freely available open source software package that implements the algorithms and examples compared here.


Projects: A2.3: Cross-talk and distinct properties of growth factor signalling reg..., A2.5: Integration of insulin and Wnt signalling in hepatocytes, A3.2: Cross-talk of signaling pathways and endocytic machinery in hepato...

PLoS ONE 8(9): e74335
30th Sep 2013

Andreas Raue, Marcel Schilling, Julie Bachmann, Andrew Matteson, Max Schelke, Daniel Kaschek, Sabine Hug, Clemens Kreutz, Brian D Harms, Fabian J Theis, Ursula Klingmüller, Jens Timmer

help Authors

[Andreas Raue] [Daniel Kaschek] [Clemens Kreutz] [Fabian Theis] [Ursula Klingmüller]

help Attributions


help Scales

Views: 2115
  • Created: 14th Jan 2014 at 11:35

Related items


Log in / Register

Need an account?
Sign up

Forgotten password?

Front Page

Virtual Liver Network


Related Projects and friends

Imprint Taverna workflow workbench myExperiment JWS Online ISATAB myGrid Sabio-RK BioPortal Semantic SBML

Powered by:


Silk icons 1.3
Crystal Clear icons